Map of National
State Logo
StateMapMotion

Review timing of child contact centre referrals at family court

National
·187 reactions·100% agree

Review the need for early intervention through contact centres at the point when court applications are made. We think this could help ensure children maintain relationships with both parents while legal processes are ongoing.

Mr David Lammy

Mr David Lammy

Deputy Prime Minister

Deputy Prime Minister

React

Where do you stand on this motion?

Reasons for5
Reasons against0

See what others are saying

Members can read every reason.

Similar motions

Require review hearings for all Child Arrangements Orders

Legislate to require all Child Arrangements Orders to be subject to compulsory, automatic review hearings in the family court, for example at three-month and six-month intervals, with an expectation that both parents adhere to and engage with the process by law.

11Reasons
National

Record and retain all contacts relating to family court proceedings

Any meetings (wherever they happen), emails, phone calls and court hearings involving the parties to Family Court proceedings and court staff, judges or officers of the court such as CAFCASS staff or other professionals who are required to give expert evidence, should be recorded and retained.

3Reasons
National

Urgent review of CPS decision making for domestic abuse and coercive control

We call on the Government to urgently review CPS investigations and charging decisions in domestic abuse and coercive control cases, to ensure the law is being applied correctly and all forms of abuse are taken seriously, not just extreme physical violence.

4Reasons
National

Require family court to refer findings of abuse & coercive control to the police

When the family court makes findings of Emotional Abuse (EA) and/or Coercive Control (CC), but the findings not accepted by perpetrators, these cases should be automatically referred to the police for further investigation. This should not be incumbent upon the victims/survivors.

5Reasons
National

Review Child Maintenance Service to disincentivise parents withholding custody

We think the Child Maintenance Service should be reviewed and reformed to prevent situations where a parent refuses to allow 50/50 etc custody of a child because they will lose payments.

7Reasons
National
HelpPrivacyContact
Map of National
State Logo

Review timing of child contact centre referrals at family court

National

Review the need for early intervention through contact centres at the point when court applications are made. We think this could help ensure children maintain relationships with both parents while legal processes are ongoing.

National
187 reactions·100% agree
Mr David Lammy

Mr David Lammy

Deputy Prime Minister

Deputy Prime Minister

React

Where do you stand on this motion?

Reasons for5
Reasons against0

See what others are saying

Members can read every reason.

Similar motions

Require review hearings for all Child Arrangements Orders

Legislate to require all Child Arrangements Orders to be subject to compulsory, automatic review hearings in the family court, for example at three-month and six-month intervals, with an expectation that both parents adhere to and engage with the process by law.

11Reasons
National

Record and retain all contacts relating to family court proceedings

Any meetings (wherever they happen), emails, phone calls and court hearings involving the parties to Family Court proceedings and court staff, judges or officers of the court such as CAFCASS staff or other professionals who are required to give expert evidence, should be recorded and retained.

3Reasons
National

Urgent review of CPS decision making for domestic abuse and coercive control

We call on the Government to urgently review CPS investigations and charging decisions in domestic abuse and coercive control cases, to ensure the law is being applied correctly and all forms of abuse are taken seriously, not just extreme physical violence.

4Reasons
National

Require family court to refer findings of abuse & coercive control to the police

When the family court makes findings of Emotional Abuse (EA) and/or Coercive Control (CC), but the findings not accepted by perpetrators, these cases should be automatically referred to the police for further investigation. This should not be incumbent upon the victims/survivors.

5Reasons
National

Review Child Maintenance Service to disincentivise parents withholding custody

We think the Child Maintenance Service should be reviewed and reformed to prevent situations where a parent refuses to allow 50/50 etc custody of a child because they will lose payments.

7Reasons
National
HelpPrivacyContact