Map of National
State Logo
StateMapMotion

Ban publication of police officer names in misconduct hearings if not sacked

National
·8,066 reactions·100% agree

When police officers face misconduct hearings, their names are routinely published by their force and reported in the press — even in cases where they are not dismissed.

Shabana Mahmood

Shabana Mahmood

Home Secretary

Home Secretary

React

Where do you stand on this motion?

Reasons for4
Reasons against0

See what others are saying

Members can read every reason.

Similar motions

Ban serving or former police officers from working on/advising the OPCC

The Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner (OPCC) is meant to hold police forces accountable. Yet we feel its current structure allows serving or former officers, and elected officials with close ties to law enforcement, to oversee misconduct investigations involving their own colleagues

6Reasons
National

Introduce a public misconduct register for police accountability & transparency

Legislate to introduce a public misconduct register for police found guilty of misconduct or gross misconduct, including bullying and discrimination. We think this should be known as 'Isabelle’s Law'.

32Reasons
National

Outlaw both parties from being named publicly in domestic abuse allegations

Pass a law which bans both parties from being publicly named in criminal cases relating to domestic abuse allegations until the defendant is prosecuted and found guilty.

2Reasons
National

Remove Regulation 4(8) of the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020

Amend the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020 so that misconduct proceedings can be brought against any former police officer, regardless of when they left the service. We believe the current cut-off date of 15 December 2017 unfairly prevents accountability for past abuse and corruption.

5Reasons
National
HelpPrivacyContact
Map of National
State Logo

Ban publication of police officer names in misconduct hearings if not sacked

National

When police officers face misconduct hearings, their names are routinely published by their force and reported in the press — even in cases where they are not dismissed.

National
8,066 reactions·100% agree
Shabana Mahmood

Shabana Mahmood

Home Secretary

Home Secretary

React

Where do you stand on this motion?

Reasons for4
Reasons against0

See what others are saying

Members can read every reason.

Similar motions

Ban serving or former police officers from working on/advising the OPCC

The Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner (OPCC) is meant to hold police forces accountable. Yet we feel its current structure allows serving or former officers, and elected officials with close ties to law enforcement, to oversee misconduct investigations involving their own colleagues

6Reasons
National

Introduce a public misconduct register for police accountability & transparency

Legislate to introduce a public misconduct register for police found guilty of misconduct or gross misconduct, including bullying and discrimination. We think this should be known as 'Isabelle’s Law'.

32Reasons
National

Outlaw both parties from being named publicly in domestic abuse allegations

Pass a law which bans both parties from being publicly named in criminal cases relating to domestic abuse allegations until the defendant is prosecuted and found guilty.

2Reasons
National

Remove Regulation 4(8) of the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020

Amend the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020 so that misconduct proceedings can be brought against any former police officer, regardless of when they left the service. We believe the current cut-off date of 15 December 2017 unfairly prevents accountability for past abuse and corruption.

5Reasons
National
HelpPrivacyContact