Map of National
State Logo
StateMapMotion

Have a set maximum amount for child maintenance per child.

National
·25 reactions·100% agree

Stop increasing child maintenance due to a paying parent earning more

Mr David Lammy

Mr David Lammy

Deputy Prime Minister

Deputy Prime Minister

React

Where do you stand on this motion?

Reasons for5
Reasons against0

See what others are saying

Members can read every reason.

Similar motions

Require child maintenance payments to increase by inflation & review enforcement

We call the Government to review and look into reforming Child Maintenance Service (CMS). We believe the current payment system does not reflect the true cost of raising children, especially in the current cost of living crisis.

17Reasons
National

Include Child Maintenance as Income in Universal Credit and Means-Tested Benefit

Child maintenance payment is not counted as income for Universal Credit, allowing some to receive maintenance payments and benefits. At the same time, paying parents must meet their obligations even where those payments reduce their overall household income below the Universal Credit threshold.

26Reasons
National

Reform Child Maintenance calculation: include daytime care and actual costs

Reform the CMS calculation so payments reflect real care. Include all childcare time by paying parents, not just overnight stays. Automatically factor in costs related to travel and a child’s disabilities or long-term health conditions, rather than requiring a separate application for variation.

5Reasons
National

Review Child Maintenance Service to disincentivise parents withholding custody

We think the Child Maintenance Service should be reviewed and reformed to prevent situations where a parent refuses to allow 50/50 etc custody of a child because they will lose payments.

7Reasons
National

Keep two-child benefit cap for fairness and sustainable public spending

I want the government to keep the two-child benefit cap to support fair and sustainable welfare spending. Retaining the cap will help manage public finances responsibly and ensure that benefits remain targeted and effective for those most in need.

20Reasons
National
HelpPrivacyContact
Map of National
State Logo

Have a set maximum amount for child maintenance per child.

National

Stop increasing child maintenance due to a paying parent earning more

National
25 reactions·100% agree
Mr David Lammy

Mr David Lammy

Deputy Prime Minister

Deputy Prime Minister

React

Where do you stand on this motion?

Reasons for5
Reasons against0

See what others are saying

Members can read every reason.

Similar motions

Require child maintenance payments to increase by inflation & review enforcement

We call the Government to review and look into reforming Child Maintenance Service (CMS). We believe the current payment system does not reflect the true cost of raising children, especially in the current cost of living crisis.

17Reasons
National

Include Child Maintenance as Income in Universal Credit and Means-Tested Benefit

Child maintenance payment is not counted as income for Universal Credit, allowing some to receive maintenance payments and benefits. At the same time, paying parents must meet their obligations even where those payments reduce their overall household income below the Universal Credit threshold.

26Reasons
National

Reform Child Maintenance calculation: include daytime care and actual costs

Reform the CMS calculation so payments reflect real care. Include all childcare time by paying parents, not just overnight stays. Automatically factor in costs related to travel and a child’s disabilities or long-term health conditions, rather than requiring a separate application for variation.

5Reasons
National

Review Child Maintenance Service to disincentivise parents withholding custody

We think the Child Maintenance Service should be reviewed and reformed to prevent situations where a parent refuses to allow 50/50 etc custody of a child because they will lose payments.

7Reasons
National

Keep two-child benefit cap for fairness and sustainable public spending

I want the government to keep the two-child benefit cap to support fair and sustainable welfare spending. Retaining the cap will help manage public finances responsibly and ensure that benefits remain targeted and effective for those most in need.

20Reasons
National
HelpPrivacyContact