Suspend Green Belt Protections for Housing
1 person across UK responded, 100% favour. Most significant reasons: UK missing 1.5m housing targets and Government already weakening planning constraints. Most mentioned reasons for and against are around: Housing Supply and Environmental Protection.
React
Where do you stand on this motion?
See what others are saying
Members can read every reason.
Similar motions
Protect green belt land and playing fields
A petition opposes plans to reduce Farnham Park's golf course from 18 to 9 holes and build a professional football academy on green belt land. The petition argues this represents a major change to public recreational land without proper consultation.
Hold a referendum on banning housing developments in the green belt
Let the country decide what happens to its own green belt and historic villages and towns. Call a referendum on banning housing developments on green belt land.
Green belt development policy implementation inadequate
A resident expresses concern that delays in updating local plan policies are allowing excessive green belt development and government overturning of council decisions.
Green belt development pressure and planning appeals
Local plan delays allowing excessive green belt development applications and government appeal decisions. Concern about countryside loss due to planning policy gaps.
Require faster eviction process, and improve protections for landlords in PRS
We petition the Government to amend the law for landlords by instituting a 6-week expedited court process for Mandatory Grounds s8/7A (arrears/Anti-Social Behaviour), creating a registered-landlord database of court-evicted tenants, and raising the deposit cap to adequately cover severe damage.
Suspend Green Belt Protections for Housing
1 person across UK responded, 100% favour. Most significant reasons: UK missing 1.5m housing targets and Government already weakening planning constraints. Most mentioned reasons for and against are around: Housing Supply and Environmental Protection.
React
Where do you stand on this motion?
See what others are saying
Members can read every reason.
Similar motions
Protect green belt land and playing fields
A petition opposes plans to reduce Farnham Park's golf course from 18 to 9 holes and build a professional football academy on green belt land. The petition argues this represents a major change to public recreational land without proper consultation.
Hold a referendum on banning housing developments in the green belt
Let the country decide what happens to its own green belt and historic villages and towns. Call a referendum on banning housing developments on green belt land.
Green belt development policy implementation inadequate
A resident expresses concern that delays in updating local plan policies are allowing excessive green belt development and government overturning of council decisions.
Green belt development pressure and planning appeals
Local plan delays allowing excessive green belt development applications and government appeal decisions. Concern about countryside loss due to planning policy gaps.
Require faster eviction process, and improve protections for landlords in PRS
We petition the Government to amend the law for landlords by instituting a 6-week expedited court process for Mandatory Grounds s8/7A (arrears/Anti-Social Behaviour), creating a registered-landlord database of court-evicted tenants, and raising the deposit cap to adequately cover severe damage.