Map of National
State Logo
StateMapMotion

Ban the non-stun slaughter of animals

National
·30,839 reactions·100% agree

Ban non-stun slaughter. We think it is cruel and causes unnecessary harm to the animals being slaughtered/butchered.

Emma Reynolds

Emma Reynolds

Environment Secretary

Environment Secretary

React

Where do you stand on this motion?

Reasons for2
Reasons against0

See what others are saying

Members can read every reason.

Similar motions

Ban all forms of animal mutilation unless required for essential veterinary care

We urge the UK Government to ban all forms of animal mutilation done for non-medical reasons, including ear cropping, tail docking, debeaking, dehorning, and tooth clipping unless required for essential veterinary care.

8Reasons
National

Ban the use of live animals in Local Authority organised parades and events

Ban any local authority event from using live animals such as reindeer in public parades.

6Reasons
National

Ban the sale of rope toys for animals

Ban the sale of rope toys for animals. String and rope are classified as foreign bodies which are dangerous and can cause blockages and death in animals.

6Reasons
National

Require non-stunned and stunned meat to be labelled accordingly

We think it should be required that the labelling of non-stunned and stunned meat be clearly labelled throughout the food chain. This includes shops, supermarkets, suppliers, fast food and restaurants

11.8KReasons
National

Ban the manufacture, import and sale of Rawhide as a dog treat

Rawhide dog chews can pose a serious risk to animal welfare, such as choking, blockages and illness. We ask the UK Government to ban the manufacture, import and sale of rawhide dog chews. Safer alternatives exist, and a ban could protect pets and prevent avoidable harm.

103Reasons
National
HelpPrivacyContact
Map of National
State Logo

Ban the non-stun slaughter of animals

National

Ban non-stun slaughter. We think it is cruel and causes unnecessary harm to the animals being slaughtered/butchered.

National
30,839 reactions·100% agree
Emma Reynolds

Emma Reynolds

Environment Secretary

Environment Secretary

React

Where do you stand on this motion?

Reasons for2
Reasons against0

See what others are saying

Members can read every reason.

Similar motions

Ban all forms of animal mutilation unless required for essential veterinary care

We urge the UK Government to ban all forms of animal mutilation done for non-medical reasons, including ear cropping, tail docking, debeaking, dehorning, and tooth clipping unless required for essential veterinary care.

8Reasons
National

Ban the use of live animals in Local Authority organised parades and events

Ban any local authority event from using live animals such as reindeer in public parades.

6Reasons
National

Ban the sale of rope toys for animals

Ban the sale of rope toys for animals. String and rope are classified as foreign bodies which are dangerous and can cause blockages and death in animals.

6Reasons
National

Require non-stunned and stunned meat to be labelled accordingly

We think it should be required that the labelling of non-stunned and stunned meat be clearly labelled throughout the food chain. This includes shops, supermarkets, suppliers, fast food and restaurants

11.8KReasons
National

Ban the manufacture, import and sale of Rawhide as a dog treat

Rawhide dog chews can pose a serious risk to animal welfare, such as choking, blockages and illness. We ask the UK Government to ban the manufacture, import and sale of rawhide dog chews. Safer alternatives exist, and a ban could protect pets and prevent avoidable harm.

103Reasons
National
HelpPrivacyContact