Map of National
State Logo
StateMapMotion

Require organisers and attendees to pay for policing of protests

National
·73 reactions·100% agree

We seek a change in the law, whereby any march or demonstration that requires a police presence, the cost must be borne by the attendees and the organisers, not the taxpayer.

Rachel Reeves

Rachel Reeves

Chancellor

Chancellor

React

Where do you stand on this motion?

Reasons for1
Reasons against0

See what others are saying

Members can read every reason.

Similar motions

Require protesters and police to be easily identifiable during protests

We want Parliament to require protesters to not cover their faces at protests and to ban police from covering badge numbers to ensure both protesters and police can be easily identifiable. We believe this ensures accountability for violence or excessive force, protecting peaceful, lawful protest.

6Reasons
National

Ban paid protesting

We want paid protesting to be criminalised. We think it is insincere, immoral, and is little more than an act of paying people to create public nuisances, antagonise current protests and falsely sway public opinion.

29Reasons
National

Uneven parking enforcement at major events

During a major event, permit holders are charged for parking while event visitors park freely without enforcement. No parking wardens were present despite the large gathering.

4Reasons
Bradford West

Review rules, policing and harm of marches

We want Government to review stricter permits for and costs of policing disruptive marches, penalties for organisers of protests where antisemitic or extremist activity takes place, and the policing, economic and community harm caused by protests.

176Reasons
National

Legislate to ban participants wearing face coverings at demonstrations

Government should introduce legislation to make it an offence to attend a demonstration or counter-demonstration wearing face coverings. All participants should be showing their faces, or, be arrested so that they can be identified.

34Reasons
National
HelpPrivacyContact
Map of National
State Logo

Require organisers and attendees to pay for policing of protests

National

We seek a change in the law, whereby any march or demonstration that requires a police presence, the cost must be borne by the attendees and the organisers, not the taxpayer.

National
73 reactions·100% agree
Rachel Reeves

Rachel Reeves

Chancellor

Chancellor

React

Where do you stand on this motion?

Reasons for1
Reasons against0

See what others are saying

Members can read every reason.

Similar motions

Require protesters and police to be easily identifiable during protests

We want Parliament to require protesters to not cover their faces at protests and to ban police from covering badge numbers to ensure both protesters and police can be easily identifiable. We believe this ensures accountability for violence or excessive force, protecting peaceful, lawful protest.

6Reasons
National

Ban paid protesting

We want paid protesting to be criminalised. We think it is insincere, immoral, and is little more than an act of paying people to create public nuisances, antagonise current protests and falsely sway public opinion.

29Reasons
National

Uneven parking enforcement at major events

During a major event, permit holders are charged for parking while event visitors park freely without enforcement. No parking wardens were present despite the large gathering.

4Reasons
Bradford West

Review rules, policing and harm of marches

We want Government to review stricter permits for and costs of policing disruptive marches, penalties for organisers of protests where antisemitic or extremist activity takes place, and the policing, economic and community harm caused by protests.

176Reasons
National

Legislate to ban participants wearing face coverings at demonstrations

Government should introduce legislation to make it an offence to attend a demonstration or counter-demonstration wearing face coverings. All participants should be showing their faces, or, be arrested so that they can be identified.

34Reasons
National
HelpPrivacyContact