Map of National
State Logo
StateMapMotion

Mandatory trauma-informed training and standards in the family courts service

National
·1,713 reactions·100% agree

We call on the Government to ensure mandatory trauma-informed training and standards for all professionals whose assessments influence decisions in the family courts, including judges, CAFCASS officers, social workers, and court-instructed medical experts.

Mr David Lammy

Mr David Lammy

Deputy Prime Minister

Deputy Prime Minister

React

Where do you stand on this motion?

Reasons for3
Reasons against0

See what others are saying

Members can read every reason.

Similar motions

Mandate trauma-informed training in justice, healthcare, education & social care

Introduce legislation to require professional bodies to include accredited trauma-informed training as a mandatory requirement for professionals in justice, healthcare, education & social care. Embed into standards, inspections & safeguarding frameworks to ensure consistent understanding of trauma.

34Reasons
National

Mandate domestic violence training for all family court & social workers

We want the Government to mandate accredited training in domestic abuse, coercive control and trauma for all social workers and family-court professionals. We believe national standards must be set to ensure consistent safeguarding and better protection for survivors and children.

6Reasons
National

Hold public inquiry on safeguarding system and training in family courts

We think the Family Courts and social services, Cafcass, CPS are failing to safeguard children, overlooking evidence and allowing harmful practices. We want a public inquiry into accountability, what we see as systemic failings and bias, and effects of current procedures on child and family welfare.

135Reasons
National

Require family court to refer findings of abuse & coercive control to the police

When the family court makes findings of Emotional Abuse (EA) and/or Coercive Control (CC), but the findings not accepted by perpetrators, these cases should be automatically referred to the police for further investigation. This should not be incumbent upon the victims/survivors.

5Reasons
National

Require family judges to complete LGBTQ+ family sensitivity training

Make LGBTQ+ family sensitivity training compulsory for judges before sitting family cases, developed with LGBTQ+ family charities. We believe this could help to address any unconscious bias and protect the rights and welfare of children and parents.

40Reasons
National
HelpPrivacyContact
Map of National
State Logo

Mandatory trauma-informed training and standards in the family courts service

National

We call on the Government to ensure mandatory trauma-informed training and standards for all professionals whose assessments influence decisions in the family courts, including judges, CAFCASS officers, social workers, and court-instructed medical experts.

National
1,713 reactions·100% agree
Mr David Lammy

Mr David Lammy

Deputy Prime Minister

Deputy Prime Minister

React

Where do you stand on this motion?

Reasons for3
Reasons against0

See what others are saying

Members can read every reason.

Similar motions

Mandate trauma-informed training in justice, healthcare, education & social care

Introduce legislation to require professional bodies to include accredited trauma-informed training as a mandatory requirement for professionals in justice, healthcare, education & social care. Embed into standards, inspections & safeguarding frameworks to ensure consistent understanding of trauma.

34Reasons
National

Mandate domestic violence training for all family court & social workers

We want the Government to mandate accredited training in domestic abuse, coercive control and trauma for all social workers and family-court professionals. We believe national standards must be set to ensure consistent safeguarding and better protection for survivors and children.

6Reasons
National

Hold public inquiry on safeguarding system and training in family courts

We think the Family Courts and social services, Cafcass, CPS are failing to safeguard children, overlooking evidence and allowing harmful practices. We want a public inquiry into accountability, what we see as systemic failings and bias, and effects of current procedures on child and family welfare.

135Reasons
National

Require family court to refer findings of abuse & coercive control to the police

When the family court makes findings of Emotional Abuse (EA) and/or Coercive Control (CC), but the findings not accepted by perpetrators, these cases should be automatically referred to the police for further investigation. This should not be incumbent upon the victims/survivors.

5Reasons
National

Require family judges to complete LGBTQ+ family sensitivity training

Make LGBTQ+ family sensitivity training compulsory for judges before sitting family cases, developed with LGBTQ+ family charities. We believe this could help to address any unconscious bias and protect the rights and welfare of children and parents.

40Reasons
National
HelpPrivacyContact